stats/?gameid=454002&st=0
We played 4 vs 2, we asked rmk for one leaver till 10 (ass the rule said and IVORT didn't give rmk). Please cancel the
game and give BAN fir him!
BAN FOR NO RMK
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Модератор
- Posts: 919
Re: BAN FOR NO RMK
I don't understand anything))
you played 4x4 and tried to throw out the 1st
What's wrong? describe it in detail. time frame (lvl, game time, etc.)
you played 4x4 and tried to throw out the 1st
What's wrong? describe it in detail. time frame (lvl, game time, etc.)
-
- Posts: 44
Re: BAN FOR NO RMK
ok, doesn't matter, I gave the link, but is about IVORT, no ban right?
We kiked one player because he ruined the game, but after this, another one, QUILOASA, LEAVED THE GAME at level 8. We asked rmk, and some of the enemy team gave RMK but IVORT didn't give, so we lost 2 v 4!. Is clear now? We asked rmk for the leaver, not for the payer we kiked, The rule you sent to me, said, if till 10 ask RMK, it is an obligation to give or not???
We kiked one player because he ruined the game, but after this, another one, QUILOASA, LEAVED THE GAME at level 8. We asked rmk, and some of the enemy team gave RMK but IVORT didn't give, so we lost 2 v 4!. Is clear now? We asked rmk for the leaver, not for the payer we kiked, The rule you sent to me, said, if till 10 ask RMK, it is an obligation to give or not???
-
- Модератор
- Posts: 3641
Re: BAN FOR NO RMK
На 7 лвле было утрачено значительное преимущество в виде хилов короля и кикнутого игрока. Соперник не обязан в подобных ситуациях давать RMK. Без отмены и банов.
